Research · data study · Q4 2026 update, data as of 1 November 2026
State of OnlyFans Agency Contracts 2026
What 29 OnlyFans management agencies put in writing about commission, contract term, exit, login, payouts and service, counted from their own websites and public registers. Evidence checked 1 November 2026.
How we rank: 16 criteria with published weights, scored only from what each agency publishes on its own website or in a public register. The quote, the link and the date sit beside every score; anything not published scores 0. No agency pays to be listed or for its position. Methodology
- 29agencies
- 48%of 29 publish no commission rate
- 72%of 29 silent on post-exit commission
- 387verbatim quotes
Q4 2026 update, data as of 1 November 2026. Every agency website was captured again and every number recomputed. What changed since October.
Key findings
Each line is a count from the evidence data; the agencies behind every number are listed in the sections below and in the data file.
- 15 of 29 publish a rate, but only 11 (38%) also say whether it is taken from net or gross earnings.
- Among the 14 agencies with a published full-management rate, the median range runs from 35% to 55%; the lowest published figure is 20% and the highest 60%.
- Only 8 of 29 (28%) state in writing that no commission is owed after the creator leaves; 21 say nothing about it.
- 19 of 29 say there is no minimum term, but only 13 publish a notice period and just 2 publish all four exit terms (no minimum term, notice of 30 days or less, no exit fee, no automatic renewal).
- 12 of 29 (41%) state that the creator keeps sole control of her login and two-factor codes; 5 disclose shared access and 12 do not say who holds the login.
- 11 of 29 (38%) state that platform payouts go straight to the creator's own account; 1 says they pass through the agency and 17 do not say where the money goes.
- 20 of 29 say leak takedowns are part of the service, but only 5 name a typical takedown time.
- 15 of 29 say who writes the messages fans receive; only 4 make an explicit statement about AI in fan chats.
- 21 of 29 name a legal entity, but only 6 publish name, jurisdiction, address and a register ID that a creator can look up.
- For 19 of 29 agencies (66%) the oldest public record (register, domain or web archive) is less than three years old; the median is 2.5 years.
- Transparency clusters: of the 15 agencies that publish a commission, 6 (40%) also rule out commission after exit; of the 14 that do not, 2 (14%) do.
What changed since October
We captured the 482 saved pages of the 29 agencies again on 1 November 2026 and compared them with the copies from 22 October 2026. The text changed on 156 pages at 16 agencies; most of those edits were navigation, blog lists or wording. 4 agencies changed a term counted on this page.
Agencies
- TopStar MGMT: commission rate: not published → 40–60%; commission basis: not published → net; minimum term: not published → none; notice period (days): not published → none (leave any time); no exit fee stated: no → yes; commission after exit: not published → none; login: not stated → shared login disclosed; payouts: not stated → direct to the creator. Score 1.5 → 5.8, rank #24 → #8.
- Imperium MGMT: register ID published: no → yes; entity fully checkable: no → yes. Score 4.7 → 5.2, rank #13 → #13.
- Fan Fusion: serves German-speaking creators: no → yes.
- Noblesse Studios: stated seat: US (Wyoming LLC), EN + DE → US (Florida LLC), EN + DE.
Numbers that moved
| Statistic | 22 October 2026 | 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| publish a commission rate or range | 14 of 29 | 15 of 29 |
| publish the rate and say whether it is taken from net or gross | 10 of 29 | 11 of 29 |
| calculate commission on net earnings | 9 of 29 | 10 of 29 |
| publish no commission rate at all | 15 of 29 | 14 of 29 |
| full-management commission, % (published ranges; flat rates count as low = high) | 13 of 29 | 14 of 29 |
| of the agencies with a full-management rate, top of the range reaches 60% | 6 of 14 | 7 of 14 |
| state that there is no minimum term | 18 of 29 | 19 of 29 |
| publish nothing on contract term | 9 of 29 | 8 of 29 |
| publish a notice period (including none) | 12 of 29 | 13 of 29 |
| notice period 0 days | 5 of 29 | 6 of 29 |
| state that there is no exit fee | 10 of 29 | 11 of 29 |
| state that no commission is owed after the creator leaves | 7 of 29 | 8 of 29 |
| say nothing about commission after exit | 22 of 29 | 21 of 29 |
| disclose shared access to the login | 4 of 29 | 5 of 29 |
| do not say who holds the login | 13 of 29 | 12 of 29 |
| state that platform payouts go straight to the creator | 10 of 29 | 11 of 29 |
| do not say where payouts go | 18 of 29 | 17 of 29 |
| publish a register ID that can be looked up | 6 of 29 | 7 of 29 |
| publish name, jurisdiction, address and register ID | 5 of 29 | 6 of 29 |
| score below 5 out of 10 | 18 of 29 | 16 of 29 |
| agencies serving German-speaking creators (German-language site or service, or seat in Germany/Austria/Switzerland) | 14 of 29 | 15 of 29 |
| Agencies with a published full-management rate | 13 | 14 |
| Median range, full management | 35.0–50.0% | 35.0–55.0% |
| Median index score | 3.2 | 4.2 |
16 agencies moved in the ranking. Only 2 scores changed; every other move follows from them. The order is computed by the same rules as before (methodology 2.0).
Computed by a script from the October and November data; the October files are kept unchanged in the archive. A change counts only when a quoted term or a coded category differs. Full diff: changes-q4-2026.json.
Method and sample
We read the public website of each of the 29 OnlyFans management agencies in the Creator Agency Review index and the public company registers they point to. Every page we used was saved and identified by its SHA-256 hash; 387 verbatim quotes back the facts counted here. Evidence was checked on 1 November 2026.
- What counts: a fact counts only if the agency publishes it on a page people can read, or a public register shows it. A term discussed “on the call” counts as not published.
- Not published is not the same as “no”. An agency that does not publish an exit fee may or may not charge one. This study measures what a creator can check before the first call.
- German-speaking market: a German-language site, a quote naming German service, or a seat in Germany, Austria or Switzerland.
- Agency age: the oldest public record (register date, domain registration or first web-archive capture). Founding years an agency states about itself are not used; records before 2016, when OnlyFans launched, are ignored.
- Sample: the 29 agencies in our index, found through English- and German-language search results and agency lists, with deliberate coverage of the German-speaking market. It is not a random sample, and agencies that publish their terms may be over-represented. Percentages are shares of 29, so one agency moves a share by about 3.4 points.
- Reproducible: the counts are produced by a script from the same evidence files that drive the ranking methodology (version 2.0).
The 29 agencies in the sample
| Agency | Seat as published | German-speaking market |
|---|---|---|
| ANIK Studios | US (Florida LLC), German-language site | yes |
| Aruna Talent | US (Wyoming LLC) | no |
| B9 Agency | Slovenia (d.o.o.) | no |
| BeaconOFM | Georgia (address only) | no |
| Bunny Agency | US (Wyoming LLC) | yes |
| Creators Inc | US (Los Angeles / Miami) | no |
| Fame Dollz | US (Wyoming LLC: Goldmann 888 LLC) | no |
| Fan Fusion | US (Wyoming LLC) | yes |
| FansHub | UK (FansHub Ltd) | no |
| FEM Management | US (Florida LLC: FTD Media LLC), DACH focus | yes |
| Foxy Studios | Switzerland (Javór GmbH, Baar) | yes |
| GAIA Talents | PL (Warsaw, Sp. z o.o.); DE/EN site, DACH focus | yes |
| Hush Talent | US (Hush Talent Inc.; Greenwich CT / New York / Los Angeles) | no |
| Imperium MGMT | US (Praetorium LLC) | no |
| Lookstars | not published | no |
| Lumina Connect | Germany (sole trader, Quakenbrück) | yes |
| Lumos Agency | Germany (UG, HRB 109576 Saarbrücken) | yes |
| LUX Agency | Cyprus (LUXAGENCY Consulting Ltd, HE 463151) | yes |
| Noblesse Studios | US (Florida LLC), EN + DE | yes |
| Perlage Studios | US (Florida LLC), team in Austria | yes |
| Preach Agency | US (Wyoming address, no entity name) | yes |
| SheX Agency | not published ('Gegründet in DE, Sitz in EU') | yes |
| SirenCY | Australia (QOSMIC CO PTY LTD, ABN 28 667 365 479) | no |
| TalentGrow | UK (Manchester) | no |
| TDM Management | UK (TOPDRAWERMANAGEMENT LTD, Companies House 13816810) | no |
| TEASY Agency | not published | no |
| TheBlueTalent | not published | yes |
| TopStar MGMT | not published | no |
| White Door Management | US (Wyoming LLC) | yes |
Commission: who publishes a rate
14 of 29 agencies (48%) publish no commission rate at all; the split is only given on a call or in the contract. 15 of 29 publish a rate, but only 11 (38%) also say whether it is taken from net or gross earnings.
- net 10
- gross 1
- rate without basis 4
- no rate published 14
No rate published (14)
Perlage Studios, Aruna Talent, B9 Agency, ANIK Studios, Fame Dollz, TDM Management, SheX Agency, Preach Agency, LUX Agency, Lumos Agency, FansHub, TEASY Agency, Creators Inc, TheBlueTalent
Rate without net/gross (4)
Among the 14 agencies with a published full-management rate, the median range runs from 35% to 55%; the lowest published figure is 20% and the highest 60%.
14 agencies publish a full-management rate. Median range 35–55%. Solid bar = net, outlined = gross or basis not stated, dot = flat rate. Chat-only and backend rates are not shown.
Why the basis matters: OnlyFans keeps 20% of what fans pay. 50% of gross is 62.5% of what reaches the creator, so a “lower” gross rate can cost more than a higher net rate.
Minimum term, notice and exit
19 of 29 say there is no minimum term, but only 13 publish a notice period and just 2 publish all four exit terms (no minimum term, notice of 30 days or less, no exit fee, no automatic renewal).
- no minimum term 19
- minimum term stated 2
- nothing published 8
- none (leave any time) 6
- 14 days 2
- 30 days 5
- not published 16
Minimum term stated (2)
All four exit terms (2)
Commission after the creator leaves
Only 8 of 29 (28%) state in writing that no commission is owed after the creator leaves; 21 say nothing about it.
- no commission after exit, stated 8
- post-exit commission disclosed 0
- not addressed 21
None of the 29 publishes a post-exit commission with its length and basis. Where a contract has one, the creator only learns it from the contract itself.
State no commission after exit (8)
White Door Management, Fan Fusion, Lumina Connect, BeaconOFM, FEM Management, TopStar MGMT, Perlage Studios, Aruna Talent
Login and payouts
12 of 29 (41%) state that the creator keeps sole control of her login and two-factor codes; 5 disclose shared access and 12 do not say who holds the login. 11 of 29 (38%) state that platform payouts go straight to the creator's own account; 1 says they pass through the agency and 17 do not say where the money goes.
- creator keeps sole login 12
- shared access disclosed 5
- not stated 12
- direct to the creator 11
- through the agency 1
- not stated 17
Shared access disclosed (5)
TalentGrow, TopStar MGMT, Foxy Studios, Bunny Agency, ANIK Studios
Direct payouts stated (11)
White Door Management, Fan Fusion, Lumina Connect, TalentGrow, BeaconOFM, FEM Management, TopStar MGMT, Perlage Studios, Aruna Talent, GAIA Talents, ANIK Studios
Upfront fees
20 of 29 agencies state that there are no upfront, setup or onboarding fees; 9 do not address it.
Not addressed (9)
Fame Dollz, TDM Management, SheX Agency, LUX Agency, Lumos Agency, FansHub, SirenCY, Creators Inc, TheBlueTalent
Only 2 of 29 agencies publish all six core contract terms in full: login, payouts, content rights, exit, post-exit commission and fees.
All six core terms in full (2)
Leak protection and takedown time
20 of 29 say leak takedowns are part of the service, but only 5 name a typical takedown time.
The times that are published, verbatim. Several describe how fast a notice is filed, not how fast the copy disappears:
- White Door Management: “A specialised partner provider checks for copies of your content every day and files the removal notices, so you never file one yourself.”
- White Door Management: “About one week on average, depending on the platform.”
- TalentGrow: “Automatic takedown systems search for your content under your creator name, 24 hours a day.”
- TalentGrow: “Formal DMCA notices go to hosting providers and platforms within hours of a leak being found.”
- Aruna Talent: “DMCA specialists monitor 500+ sites and file takedowns within hours of detection”
- Lookstars: “Most leaks are removed within 24-48 hours”
- Lumos Agency: “Wird ein Leak entdeckt, reagieren wir innerhalb weniger Stunden und setzen einen DMCA-Takedown-Request durch, um die Inhalte schnellstmöglich entfernen zu lassen”
Reporting to the creator
12 of 29 say how often the creator gets a written report; 3 publish a sample report.
Sample report published (3)
Who writes to fans: people or AI
15 of 29 say who writes the messages fans receive; only 4 make an explicit statement about AI in fan chats.
The AI statements, verbatim:
- White Door Management: “Only people on our team. We use no AI to write messages.”
- Fan Fusion: “Every fan-facing message is written by a human chatter. AI tools may help with editing and captions.”
- Lookstars: “But AI is a tool, not a replacement for human judgment”
- TDM Management: “When everyone shouted about AI chat, we stress-tested it across niches and threw it out for quality”
Legal entity and agency age
21 of 29 name a legal entity, but only 6 publish name, jurisdiction, address and a register ID that a creator can look up.
Fully checkable in a register (6)
Fan Fusion, Lumina Connect, Imperium MGMT, TDM Management, LUX Agency, Lumos Agency
For 19 of 29 agencies (66%) the oldest public record (register, domain or web archive) is less than three years old; the median is 2.5 years.
- under 1 year or none 2
- 1–3 years 17
- 3–5 years 7
- 5 years or more 3
Range: 0 to 8.9 years (median 2.5). A young record does not mean a young team; it means the age cannot be checked further back.
German-speaking market vs the rest
Agencies serving German-speaking creators publish a commission rate about as often as the rest (8 of 15 vs 7 of 14).
| German-speaking (n=15) | Others (n=14) | |
|---|---|---|
| Publish a commission rate or range | 8 of 15 (53%) | 7 of 14 (50%) |
| Publish the rate and say whether it is taken from net or gross | 7 of 15 (47%) | 4 of 14 (29%) |
| State that there is no minimum term | 11 of 15 (73%) | 8 of 14 (57%) |
| State that no commission is owed after the creator leaves | 5 of 15 (33%) | 3 of 14 (21%) |
| State that the creator keeps sole control of login and 2FA | 7 of 15 (47%) | 5 of 14 (36%) |
| State that platform payouts go straight to the creator | 7 of 15 (47%) | 4 of 14 (29%) |
| Say content protection (leak takedowns) is part of the service | 11 of 15 (73%) | 9 of 14 (64%) |
| State how often the creator gets a written report | 9 of 15 (60%) | 3 of 14 (21%) |
| Publish name, jurisdiction, address and register ID | 4 of 15 (27%) | 2 of 14 (14%) |
| Median index score | 5.5 | 3 |
| Median criteria published in full | 2 | 1.5 |
15 of 29 agencies serve German-speaking creators. With groups this small, differences of one or two agencies should not be read as a trend.
German-speaking market (15)
White Door Management, Fan Fusion, Lumina Connect, Noblesse Studios, FEM Management, Perlage Studios, Foxy Studios, GAIA Talents, Bunny Agency, ANIK Studios, SheX Agency, Preach Agency, LUX Agency, Lumos Agency, TheBlueTalent
Agencies that publish one term publish the others
Transparency clusters: of the 15 agencies that publish a commission, 6 (40%) also rule out commission after exit; of the 14 that do not, 2 (14%) do.
| Publish a rate (n=15) | No rate (n=14) | |
|---|---|---|
| State no commission after exit | 6 of 15 (40%) | 2 of 14 (14%) |
| Publish no minimum term and a notice period | 9 of 15 (60%) | 4 of 14 (29%) |
| State sole login | 8 of 15 (53%) | 4 of 14 (29%) |
| State direct payouts | 8 of 15 (53%) | 3 of 14 (21%) |
| Median criteria published in full | 4 | 1 |
| Median index score | 5.8 | 1.7 |
This is a correlation in a small sample, not proof of cause. It does suggest a practical shortcut: an agency that will not put its commission in writing is also less likely to put its exit terms in writing.
What creators should check before signing
- The commission rate in writing, and whether it is taken from net (after the platform fee) or gross.
- Minimum term, notice period, exit fee and automatic renewal: all four, in the contract.
- Whether any commission is owed after you leave, for how long, and on what.
- That you keep the login, email and two-factor codes, and how the team accesses the account.
- That the platform pays you directly, into your own bank account.
- Upfront, setup or tool fees: ask for a written “none”.
- Who removes leaks, how, and how long a removal typically takes.
- How often you get a written report, and a sample of one.
- Who writes to your fans (people or AI), in which languages, and how your boundaries are enforced.
- The legal entity, its register ID and address, and look it up yourself.
How to cite this study
Please link to this page when you use a number. Quote counts as “X of 29 agencies reviewed”, not as a share of the whole market.
Download the data
Licence: CC BY 4.0. Reuse is free with attribution to Creator Agency Review and a link to this page. Agencies that want a fact corrected: corrections and right of reply.
Changelog
We re-capture the agency websites every quarter and note every change here, with the date.
- : Q4 2026 update: all 29 agency websites captured again (482 pages), every number recomputed. 4 agencies changed a term counted here, 21 statistics moved. See “What changed since October”.
- : First published with evidence captured on 22 October 2026.