Head to head · #1 vs #23
White Door Management vs Lumos Agency
How we rank: 16 criteria with published weights, scored only from what each agency publishes on its own website or in a public register. The quote, the link and the date sit beside every score; anything not published scores 0. No agency pays to be listed or for its position. Methodology
#1 of 29
White Door Management
Ahead on: Login and 2FA stay with the creator, Payouts go straight to the creator, Content and pages stay the creator's and No minimum term, short notice, no exit fee (+9).
White Door Management scores higher on 13 criteria, Lumos Agency on 2, and 1 are level. White Door Management (9.3) ranks above Lumos Agency (1.5): it scores higher on 13 criteria (login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee and no commission after exit, …) and lower on 2 (legal entity in a public register and longevity, documented).
Score by group
| Group | White Door Management | Lumos Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Control (35%) | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| Money (25%) | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| Service evidence (25%) | 10.0 | 1.7 |
| Verifiability (15%) | 5.3 | 7.0 |
White Door Management
Fits if you want to keep sole control of your login and 2FA, payouts must go straight to your own account and content ownership and the end of the licence at exit matter to you.
Lumos Agency
Fits if included leak removal with a stated takedown time matters to you and you want a company you can look up in a register.
All 16 criteria side by side
| Criterion | White Door Management | Lumos Agency | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Login and 2FA stay with the creator | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 2. Payouts go straight to the creator | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 3. Content and pages stay the creator's | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 4. No minimum term, short notice, no exit fee | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 5. No commission after exit | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 6. Commission published, with basis | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 7. No upfront fees, scope itemized | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: |
| 8. Written reporting: cadence and sample | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 9. Content protection included | 10 | 10 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: |
| 10. Results with a way to verify | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 11. Says who should not sign | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 12. Exit handover published | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 13. Chat policy published | 10 | 0 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: Nothing published on the pages we read. |
| 14. Legal entity in a public register | 5 | 10 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: |
| 15. Longevity, documented | 1 | 4 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Oldest public record: domain registration (RDAP), 21 October 2026. Own founding claims do not count.Source: rdap.org/domain/whitedoormgmt.com · checked 22 October 2026 Lumos Agency: Oldest public record: first Wayback Machine capture, 13 July 2025. Own founding claims do not count.Source: web.archive.org/web/20250713062713/https://lumos-agency · checked 22 October 2026 |
| 16. Scale published | 10 | 7 | EvidenceWhite Door Management: Lumos Agency: |
Published facts side by side
| Fact | White Door Management | Lumos Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Country / company | US (Wyoming LLC) | Germany (UG, HRB 109576 Saarbrücken) |
| Languages (published) | English, German | English, German |
| Platforms | OnlyFans, Fansly | 3 |
| Commission (published) | 25–60% of net | — |
| Term and notice | no minimum term, 30 days' notice | — |
| Oldest public record | 21 October 2026 (domain registration (RDAP)) | 13 July 2025 (first Wayback Machine capture) |
| Evidence checked | 22 October 2026 | 22 October 2026 |
| Saved quotes | 37 · SHA-256 per page snapshot | 8 · SHA-256 per page snapshot |
Related
Right of reply: any agency listed here can point us to a public page that changes a score. We re-read it and publish the result, dated, in the updates log. See corrections and right of reply.