# Creator Agency Review

> Index snapshot, updated 1 November 2026: Creator Agency Review has reviewed and scored 29 OnlyFans management agencies on 16 published criteria (methodology v2.0). #1: White Door Management, 9.3/10; #2: Fan Fusion, 8.6/10. Every score carries a verbatim quote, a source link and a check date. Data: https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/ranking.json (CC BY 4.0).

Last updated: 2026-11-01
Canonical: https://creatoragencyreview.com/
Methodology version: 2.0 (https://creatoragencyreview.com/methodology/)

Disclosure: Creator Agency Review is affiliated with White Door Management No agency pays to be listed or for its position.

## Ranking in prose

### 1. White Door Management — 9.3/10
White Door Management scores 9.3/10 and ranks #1 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 14 in full, 2 in part and 0 not at all; strongest group: control (10.0). Published commission: 25–60% net (full) / 20–25% net (chat only). Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, exit handover published, chat policy published, scale published. Loses points on: legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented. Commission: 25–60% net (full) / 20–25% net (chat only). Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/white-door-management/

### 2. Fan Fusion — 8.6/10
Fan Fusion scores 8.6/10 and ranks #2 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 12 in full, 2 in part and 2 not at all; strongest group: control (10.0), weakest: verifiability (4.7). Published commission: 35–60% net (full) / 15–20% net (chat only). Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, says who should not sign, exit handover published, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register. Loses points on: results with a way to verify, longevity, documented, content protection included, scale published. Commission: 35–60% net (full) / 15–20% net (chat only). Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fan-fusion/

### 3. Lumina Connect — 7.7/10
Lumina Connect scores 7.7/10 and ranks #3 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 7 in full, 8 in part and 1 not at all; strongest group: money (10.0), weakest: verifiability (4.7). Published commission: 40–60% of net. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, results with a way to verify, legal entity in a public register. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, says who should not sign, exit handover published, chat policy published, longevity, documented, scale published. Commission: 40–60% of net. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lumina-connect/

### 4. Noblesse Studios — 6.6/10
Noblesse Studios scores 6.6/10 and ranks #4 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 6 in full, 6 in part and 4 not at all; strongest group: money (10.0), weakest: control (5.2). Published commission: 25–50% of net. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, chat policy published. Loses points on: no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, content protection included, exit handover published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, scale published, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign. Commission: 25–50% of net. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/noblesse-studios/

### 5. TalentGrow — 6.1/10
TalentGrow scores 6.1/10 and ranks #5 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 5 in full, 9 in part and 2 not at all; strongest group: service evidence (7.7), weakest: verifiability (3.0). Published commission: 60% / 50% / 40% of net by monthly band (creator keeps 40% under $10K, 50% $10K-30K, 60% from $30K). Published in full: payouts go straight to the creator, commission published, with basis, content protection included, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign. Loses points on: login and 2fa stay with the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, exit handover published, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, no commission after exit, scale published. Commission: 60% / 50% / 40% of net by monthly band (creator keeps 40% under $10K, 50% $10K-30K, 60% from $30K). Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/talentgrow/

### 6. BeaconOFM — 6.1/10
BeaconOFM scores 6.1/10 and ranks #6 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 5 in full, 7 in part and 4 not at all; strongest group: control (9.2), weakest: verifiability (1.3). Published commission: 30–50%. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no commission after exit, no upfront fees, scope itemized. Loses points on: no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, commission published, with basis, content protection included, results with a way to verify, exit handover published, chat policy published, longevity, documented, written reporting: cadence and sample, says who should not sign, legal entity in a public register, scale published. Commission: 30–50%. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/beacon-ofm/

### 7. FEM Management — 5.9/10
FEM Management scores 5.9/10 and ranks #7 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 4 in full, 8 in part and 4 not at all; strongest group: money (7.5), weakest: service evidence (2.5). Published commission: 50–60% (full) / 20–50% (backend) of net. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no upfront fees, scope itemized, content protection included, results with a way to verify, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, scale published, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, written reporting: cadence and sample, says who should not sign, exit handover published. Commission: 50–60% (full) / 20–50% (backend) of net. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fem-management/

### 8. TopStar MGMT — 5.8/10
TopStar MGMT scores 5.8/10 and ranks #8 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 4 in full, 7 in part and 5 not at all; strongest group: money (10.0), weakest: verifiability (1.3). Published commission: 40–60% of net. Published in full: payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized. Loses points on: login and 2fa stay with the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, content protection included, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, longevity, documented, written reporting: cadence and sample, exit handover published, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, scale published. Commission: 40–60% of net. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/topstar-mgmt/

### 9. Perlage Studios — 5.7/10
Perlage Studios scores 5.7/10 and ranks #9 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 5 in full, 7 in part and 4 not at all; strongest group: control (8.2), weakest: verifiability (3.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, no upfront fees, scope itemized, results with a way to verify. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, commission published, with basis, says who should not sign, exit handover published, scale published. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/perlage-studios/

### 10. Foxy Studios — 5.7/10
Foxy Studios scores 5.7/10 and ranks #10 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 2 in full, 11 in part and 3 not at all; strongest group: money (10.0), weakest: control (3.2). Published commission: 45% of net. Published in full: commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized. Loses points on: login and 2fa stay with the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, results with a way to verify, exit handover published, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, scale published, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, says who should not sign. Commission: 45% of net. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/foxy-studios/

### 11. Aruna Talent — 5.5/10
Aruna Talent scores 5.5/10 and ranks #11 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 5 in full, 9 in part and 2 not at all; strongest group: control (8.2), weakest: money (2.5). No commission rate is published. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, content protection included, scale published. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, commission published, with basis, exit handover published. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/aruna-talent/

### 12. GAIA Talents — 5.5/10
GAIA Talents scores 5.5/10 and ranks #12 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 3 in full, 9 in part and 4 not at all; strongest group: money (7.5), weakest: verifiability (3.0). Published commission: 35–50% of net. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, commission published, with basis. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, results with a way to verify, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, no commission after exit, says who should not sign, exit handover published, scale published. Commission: 35–50% of net. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/gaia-talents/

### 13. Imperium MGMT — 5.2/10
Imperium MGMT scores 5.2/10 and ranks #13 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 4 in full, 5 in part and 7 not at all; strongest group: money (10.0), weakest: service evidence (2.0). Published commission: 50% of net. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, legal entity in a public register. Loses points on: no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, content protection included, chat policy published, longevity, documented, scale published, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no commission after exit, written reporting: cadence and sample, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, exit handover published. Commission: 50% of net. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/imperium/

### 14. Bunny Agency — 4.8/10
Bunny Agency scores 4.8/10 and ranks #14 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 2 in full, 11 in part and 3 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (8.3), weakest: control (3.2). Published commission: 25–60%. Published in full: longevity, documented, scale published. Loses points on: login and 2fa stay with the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, exit handover published. Commission: 25–60%. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/bunny-agency/

### 15. Hush Talent — 4.2/10
Hush Talent scores 4.2/10 and ranks #15 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 3 in full, 5 in part and 8 not at all; strongest group: money (10.0), weakest: service evidence (1.5). Published commission: 20% of gross. Published in full: commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, longevity, documented. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, written reporting: cadence and sample, results with a way to verify, legal entity in a public register, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, content protection included, says who should not sign, exit handover published, chat policy published, scale published. Commission: 20% of gross. Minimum term: 90 days. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/hush-talent/

### 16. B9 Agency — 3.2/10
B9 Agency scores 3.2/10 and ranks #16 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 1 in full, 8 in part and 7 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (5.3), weakest: money (2.5). No commission rate is published. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator. Loses points on: no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no upfront fees, scope itemized, content protection included, results with a way to verify, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, scale published, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, written reporting: cadence and sample, says who should not sign, exit handover published. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/b9-agency/

### 17. ANIK Studios — 2.9/10
ANIK Studios scores 2.9/10 and ranks #17 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 1 in full, 7 in part and 8 not at all; strongest group: control (4.2), weakest: service evidence (1.3). No commission rate is published. Published in full: payouts go straight to the creator. Loses points on: login and 2fa stay with the creator, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no upfront fees, scope itemized, results with a way to verify, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, content and pages stay the creator's, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, says who should not sign, exit handover published, scale published. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/anik-studios/

### 18. Lookstars — 2.8/10
Lookstars scores 2.8/10 and ranks #18 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 1 in full, 6 in part and 9 not at all; strongest group: money (5.0), weakest: verifiability (1.3). Published commission: 20–30% (chat). Published in full: content protection included. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, chat policy published, longevity, documented, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, written reporting: cadence and sample, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, exit handover published, legal entity in a public register, scale published. Commission: 20–30% (chat). Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lookstars/

### 19. Fame Dollz — 1.8/10
Fame Dollz scores 1.8/10 and ranks #19 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 1 in full, 4 in part and 11 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (4.0), weakest: money (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: login and 2fa stay with the creator. Loses points on: content protection included, results with a way to verify, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, says who should not sign, exit handover published, chat policy published, scale published. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fame-dollz/

### 20. TDM Management — 1.7/10
TDM Management scores 1.7/10 and ranks #20 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 2 in full, 3 in part and 11 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (9.0), weakest: money (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: legal entity in a public register, scale published. Loses points on: results with a way to verify, chat policy published, longevity, documented, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, says who should not sign, exit handover published. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/tdm-management/

### 21. SheX Agency — 1.7/10
SheX Agency scores 1.7/10 and ranks #21 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 1 in full, 5 in part and 10 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (3.7), weakest: money (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: scale published. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, content protection included, results with a way to verify, longevity, documented, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, says who should not sign, exit handover published, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/shex-agency/

### 22. Preach Agency — 1.7/10
Preach Agency scores 1.7/10 and ranks #22 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 0 in full, 5 in part and 11 not at all; strongest group: money (2.5), weakest: control (1.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: none. Loses points on: content and pages stay the creator's, no upfront fees, scope itemized, results with a way to verify, chat policy published, longevity, documented, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, says who should not sign, exit handover published, legal entity in a public register, scale published. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/preach-agency/

### 23. LUX Agency — 1.6/10
LUX Agency scores 1.6/10 and ranks #23 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 1 in full, 6 in part and 9 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (4.7), weakest: money (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: legal entity in a public register. Loses points on: no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, results with a way to verify, chat policy published, longevity, documented, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, says who should not sign, exit handover published, scale published. Minimum term: trial month. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lux-agency/

### 24. Lumos Agency — 1.5/10
Lumos Agency scores 1.5/10 and ranks #24 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 2 in full, 2 in part and 12 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (7.0), weakest: money (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: content protection included, legal entity in a public register. Loses points on: longevity, documented, scale published, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, exit handover published, chat policy published. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lumos-agency/

### 25. FansHub — 1.4/10
FansHub scores 1.4/10 and ranks #25 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 0 in full, 5 in part and 11 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (3.0), weakest: money (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: none. Loses points on: no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, content protection included, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, exit handover published, scale published. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fanshub/

### 26. SirenCY — 1.3/10
SirenCY scores 1.3/10 and ranks #26 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 0 in full, 4 in part and 12 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (3.0), weakest: control (0.0). Published commission: 35%. Published in full: none. Loses points on: commission published, with basis, says who should not sign, legal entity in a public register, longevity, documented, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, results with a way to verify, exit handover published, chat policy published, scale published. Commission: 35%. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/sirency/

### 27. TEASY Agency — 1.2/10
TEASY Agency scores 1.2/10 and ranks #27 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 0 in full, 3 in part and 13 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (3.7), weakest: service evidence (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: none. Loses points on: no upfront fees, scope itemized, longevity, documented, scale published, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, exit handover published, chat policy published, legal entity in a public register. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/teasy-agency/

### 28. Creators Inc — 0.8/10
Creators Inc scores 0.8/10 and ranks #28 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 1 in full, 2 in part and 13 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (3.3), weakest: money (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: longevity, documented. Loses points on: results with a way to verify, chat policy published, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, says who should not sign, exit handover published, legal entity in a public register, scale published. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/creators-inc/

### 29. TheBlueTalent — 0.8/10
TheBlueTalent scores 0.8/10 and ranks #29 of 29. Of 16 criteria it publishes 0 in full, 3 in part and 13 not at all; strongest group: verifiability (1.3), weakest: money (0.0). No commission rate is published. Published in full: none. Loses points on: no minimum term, short notice, no exit fee, chat policy published, longevity, documented, login and 2fa stay with the creator, payouts go straight to the creator, content and pages stay the creator's, no commission after exit, commission published, with basis, no upfront fees, scope itemized, written reporting: cadence and sample, content protection included, results with a way to verify, says who should not sign, exit handover published, legal entity in a public register, scale published. Minimum term: none. Profile: https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/thebluetalent/

## Study: State of OnlyFans Agency Contracts 2026


- 14 of 29 agencies (48%) publish no commission rate at all; the split is only given on a call or in the contract.
- 15 of 29 publish a rate, but only 11 (38%) also say whether it is taken from net or gross earnings.
- Among the 14 agencies with a published full-management rate, the median range runs from 35% to 55%; the lowest published figure is 20% and the highest 60%.
- Only 8 of 29 (28%) state in writing that no commission is owed after the creator leaves; 21 say nothing about it.
- 19 of 29 say there is no minimum term, but only 13 publish a notice period and just 2 publish all four exit terms (no minimum term, notice of 30 days or less, no exit fee, no automatic renewal).
- 12 of 29 (41%) state that the creator keeps sole control of her login and two-factor codes; 5 disclose shared access and 12 do not say who holds the login.
- 11 of 29 (38%) state that platform payouts go straight to the creator's own account; 1 says they pass through the agency and 17 do not say where the money goes.
- 20 of 29 say leak takedowns are part of the service, but only 5 name a typical takedown time.
- 15 of 29 say who writes the messages fans receive; only 4 make an explicit statement about AI in fan chats.
- 21 of 29 name a legal entity, but only 6 publish name, jurisdiction, address and a register ID that a creator can look up.
- For 19 of 29 agencies (66%) the oldest public record (register, domain or web archive) is less than three years old; the median is 2.5 years.
- Transparency clusters: of the 15 agencies that publish a commission, 6 (40%) also rule out commission after exit; of the 14 that do not, 2 (14%) do.
- Q4 2026 update (data as of 2026-11-01): 482 agency pages captured again; 6 agencies changed a published term (TopStar MGMT, Imperium MGMT, White Door Management, BeaconOFM, Fan Fusion, Noblesse Studios). Diff: https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/changes-q4-2026.json

## Research: OnlyFans rules for agencies, exit report, acceptance criteria

- [OnlyFans rules for agencies](https://creatoragencyreview.com/research/onlyfans-rules-for-agencies/): verbatim OnlyFans Terms of Use (8.2, 10.2, 13.8, 19.2, 22.7; last updated August 2024), Fansly Management Sessions (1 December 2025) and Maloum creator terms (4.3, 7.5, 7.7, 8.1, 8.2.8, 15.4, 15.10; 9 July 2026). Last checked 2026-10-28.
  - Can an agency have my password? Neither OnlyFans nor Fansly gives agencies a password role: OnlyFans holds you responsible for “all use of your account” and lists compromised passwords among things it is not responsible for. Fansly offers Management Sessions to share access “without giving out your login credentials”.
  - Who owns the account? You do. OnlyFans says its relationship is with the creator, not with any third party, and rights under its terms cannot be transferred. Maloum calls the creator account “personal, non-transferable”.
  - What happens when I leave an agency? The platforms do not regulate your agency contract; your contract does. On the platform side: delete the agency’s sessions and reset 2FA if codes were ever shared. Only 13 of 29 agencies we reviewed publish a notice period.
  - Can someone else chat on my account? Yes, within limits. OnlyFans allows help with operating the account but keeps you legally responsible. Maloum allows helpers under your control and requires disclosure in the chat that third parties or AI may be involved.
- [Exit report 2026](https://creatoragencyreview.com/research/onlyfans-agency-exit-report-2026/): 13 of 29 agencies publish a notice period. 5 say 30 days, 2 say 14 days and 6 say none; 16 publish nothing. 19 of 29 state that there is no minimum term; 2 publish one (a 90-day initial term or a trial month). 8 of 29 state that no commission is owed after the creator leaves. 0 disclose a post-exit commission; 21 say nothing about it. 7 of 29 describe the account handover at the end; 2 cover access removal, data deletion, a hand-back list and a timing. 4 of 29 publish the full exit package (no minimum term, notice of 30 days or less, no exit fee, no post-exit commission, handover described). 7 publish nothing on term, notice, post-exit commission or handover.
- [Acceptance criteria 2026](https://creatoragencyreview.com/research/onlyfans-agency-acceptance-criteria-2026/): 0 of 29 agencies publish a minimum follower count. 3 of 29 publish a minimum income: $3,000 (2 agencies) and $10,000 a month. 2 require existing earnings without a figure. 6 of 29 state explicitly that no minimum follower count or following is required, and 7 more say they take new creators. 1 of 29 names a focus on creators who already earn but invites smaller accounts to ask. 9 of 29 publish nothing on who they accept.

## Tool: OnlyFans agency contract check

- [Contract check: is your OnlyFans agency contract fair?](https://creatoragencyreview.com/tools/contract-check/) (German: https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/tools/vertrags-check/). Free checklist, 14 questions about the creator's current agency contract, green/yellow/red per answer and a traffic-light result (one red = red; two or more yellow = yellow). Runs in the browser; nothing is uploaded or stored. Not legal advice.
  - Short answer: A fair OnlyFans agency contract takes commission from net earnings at a written rate for each service, lets you leave on 30 days’ notice without a fee, ends commission when you leave, and keeps login, payouts, content and social accounts in your name. Only 8 of 29 agencies we reviewed rule out commission after exit.
  - Commission base: net or gross: fair clause: “Commission is calculated on net earnings: the amount the platform pays out to the creator after its own fee.”
  - Commission per service: fair clause: “Full management (chatting, marketing, content planning): X% of net. Chatting only: Y% of net. No other fees.” Each service has its own written rate; full management within the published range (20%–60%).
  - Minimum term: fair clause: “There is no minimum term. Either side can end the agreement with written notice.”
  - Notice period: fair clause: “Either side can end the agreement with 30 days’ written notice (email is enough).”
  - Commission after you leave: fair clause: “No commission is owed on earnings after the end date. Commission for the final month is settled within 14 days.”
  - Login and 2FA: fair clause: “The creator keeps sole control of login, email and 2FA. The team works through access the creator can revoke at any time.”
  - Where payouts go: fair clause: “Platform payouts go to the creator’s own bank account. The agency invoices its commission monthly.”
  - Content after you leave: fair clause: “All content remains the creator’s property. At the end, the agency deletes its copies within 14 days and confirms it in writing.”
  - Penalties and buyout fees: fair clause: “There is no exit fee, penalty or holdback. Earnings up to the end date are settled normally.”
  - Exclusivity and non-compete: fair clause: “During the term, the agency is the only agency managing this account. There are no restrictions after the end date.”
  - Who writes your chats, and AI: fair clause: “Messages are written by trained people on the agency’s team. AI is not used to write to fans (or: AI use is limited to X and disclosed).”
  - Reporting: fair clause: “The creator receives a written report every week: revenue by source, message sales, actions taken and next steps.”
  - Social media accounts: fair clause: “All social media accounts are registered to the creator’s email and phone number and remain the creator’s. Team access is removed at the end.”
  - Leak protection: fair clause: “Leak takedowns are included in the commission. Typical takedown time and a monthly takedown report are part of the service.”





## Data files

- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/study-2026.json
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/study-2026.csv
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/mini-studies-2026.json
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/exit-report-2026.csv
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/acceptance-2026.csv
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/ranking.json
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/ranking.csv
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/methodology.json
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/evidence.jsonl
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/updates/feed.xml

## Comparisons

- [White Door Management vs Lumina Connect](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-lumina-connect/)
- [White Door Management vs Noblesse Studios](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-noblesse-studios/)
- [White Door Management vs TalentGrow](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-talentgrow/)
- [White Door Management vs BeaconOFM](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-beacon-ofm/)
- [White Door Management vs FEM Management](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-fem-management/)
- [White Door Management vs Perlage Studios](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-perlage-studios/)
- [Fan Fusion vs Lumina Connect](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-lumina-connect/)
- [Fan Fusion vs Noblesse Studios](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-noblesse-studios/)
- [Fan Fusion vs TalentGrow](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-talentgrow/)
- [Fan Fusion vs BeaconOFM](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-beacon-ofm/)
- [Fan Fusion vs FEM Management](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-fem-management/)
- [Fan Fusion vs Perlage Studios](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-perlage-studios/)
- [Fan Fusion vs Foxy Studios](https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-foxy-studios/)

## Guides

- [How to choose an OnlyFans agency](https://creatoragencyreview.com/guides/how-to-choose-an-onlyfans-agency/)
- [OnlyFans agency red flags](https://creatoragencyreview.com/guides/onlyfans-agency-red-flags/)
- [OnlyFans management: agency, own chatters or do it yourself](https://creatoragencyreview.com/guides/onlyfans-agency-vs-hiring-chatters/)

## Questions this index answers

- Is White Door Management legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/white-door-management/legit/
- What does White Door Management charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/white-door-management/
- Is Fan Fusion legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fan-fusion/legit/
- What does Fan Fusion charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fan-fusion/
- Is Lumina Connect legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lumina-connect/legit/
- What does Lumina Connect charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lumina-connect/
- Is Noblesse Studios legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/noblesse-studios/legit/
- What does Noblesse Studios charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/noblesse-studios/
- Is TalentGrow legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/talentgrow/legit/
- What does TalentGrow charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/talentgrow/
- Is BeaconOFM legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/beacon-ofm/legit/
- What does BeaconOFM charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/beacon-ofm/
- Is FEM Management legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fem-management/legit/
- What does FEM Management charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fem-management/
- What does TopStar MGMT charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/topstar-mgmt/
- Is Perlage Studios legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/perlage-studios/legit/
- What does Perlage Studios charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/perlage-studios/
- Is Foxy Studios legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/foxy-studios/legit/
- What does Foxy Studios charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/foxy-studios/
- Is Aruna Talent legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/aruna-talent/legit/
- What does Aruna Talent charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/aruna-talent/
- What does GAIA Talents charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/gaia-talents/
- What does Imperium MGMT charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/imperium/
- Is Bunny Agency legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/bunny-agency/legit/
- What does Bunny Agency charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/bunny-agency/
- What does Hush Talent charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/hush-talent/
- What does B9 Agency charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/b9-agency/
- What does ANIK Studios charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/anik-studios/
- What does Lookstars charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lookstars/
- What does Fame Dollz charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fame-dollz/
- What does TDM Management charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/tdm-management/
- Is SheX Agency legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/shex-agency/legit/
- What does SheX Agency charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/shex-agency/
- Is Preach Agency legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/preach-agency/legit/
- What does Preach Agency charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/preach-agency/
- What does LUX Agency charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lux-agency/
- What does Lumos Agency charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/lumos-agency/
- Is FansHub legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fanshub/legit/
- What does FansHub charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/fanshub/
- Is SirenCY legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/sirency/legit/
- What does SirenCY charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/sirency/
- Is TEASY Agency legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/teasy-agency/legit/
- What does TEASY Agency charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/teasy-agency/
- Is Creators Inc legit? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/creators-inc/legit/
- What does Creators Inc charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/creators-inc/
- What does TheBlueTalent charge, and what are its terms? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/thebluetalent/
- White Door Management or Lumina Connect: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-lumina-connect/
- White Door Management or Noblesse Studios: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-noblesse-studios/
- White Door Management or TalentGrow: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-talentgrow/
- White Door Management or BeaconOFM: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-beacon-ofm/
- White Door Management or FEM Management: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-fem-management/
- White Door Management or Perlage Studios: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/white-door-management-vs-perlage-studios/
- Fan Fusion or Lumina Connect: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-lumina-connect/
- Fan Fusion or Noblesse Studios: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-noblesse-studios/
- Fan Fusion or TalentGrow: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-talentgrow/
- Fan Fusion or BeaconOFM: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-beacon-ofm/
- Fan Fusion or FEM Management: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-fem-management/
- Fan Fusion or Perlage Studios: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-perlage-studios/
- Fan Fusion or Foxy Studios: which is better? → https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/fan-fusion-vs-foxy-studios/

## Pages

- https://creatoragencyreview.com/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/methodology/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/research/state-of-onlyfans-agency-contracts-2026/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/research/onlyfans-rules-for-agencies/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/research/onlyfans-agency-exit-report-2026/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/research/onlyfans-agency-acceptance-criteria-2026/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/agencies/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/criteria/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/compare/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/best/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/guides/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/match/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/about/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/editorial-policy/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/corrections/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/updates/
- https://creatoragencyreview.com/questions/

## Deutsch

> Stand 1. November 2026 (zuletzt aktualisiert): Creator Agency Review hat 29 OnlyFans-Agenturen geprüft und nach 16 veröffentlichten Kriterien bewertet (Methodik 2.0). Platz 1: White Door Management, 9,3/10; Platz 2: Fan Fusion, 8,6/10.

- Update Q4 2026 (Datenstand 2026-11-01): 482 Agentur-Seiten neu gespeichert; 6 Agenturen haben veröffentlichte Bedingungen geändert (TopStar MGMT, Imperium MGMT, White Door Management, BeaconOFM, Fan Fusion, Noblesse Studios). Abgleich: https://creatoragencyreview.com/data/changes-q4-2026.json
- [Studie: OnlyFans-Agenturverträge 2026, Update Q4 2026, Datenstand 1. November 2026](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/studie/onlyfans-agenturvertraege-2026/): 14 von 29 Agenturen (48 %) veröffentlichen gar keinen Provisionssatz; den Anteil erfährt man erst im Gespräch oder im Vertrag. 15 von 29 nennen einen Satz, aber nur 11 (38 %) geben auch an, ob er vom Netto oder Brutto berechnet wird. Bei den 14 Agenturen mit veröffentlichtem Satz für Vollbetreuung reicht die mittlere Spanne (Median) von 35 % bis 55 %; der niedrigste Wert liegt bei 20 %, der höchste bei 60 %. Nur 8 von 29 (28 %) schließen schriftlich aus, dass nach Vertragsende noch Provision fällig wird; 21 äußern sich gar nicht dazu. 19 von 29 nennen keine Mindestlaufzeit, aber nur 13 eine …
- [OnlyFans-Regeln für Agenturen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/recherche/onlyfans-regeln-fuer-agenturen/): Plattform-Texte von OnlyFans, Fansly und Maloum im Wortlaut, geprüft am 2026-10-28.
- [Ausstiegs-Report 2026](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/recherche/onlyfans-agentur-ausstieg-2026/): 13 von 29 Agenturen nennen eine Kündigungsfrist: 5 nennen 30 Tage, 2 14 Tage und 6 keine Frist; 16 nennen nichts. 19 von 29 geben an, dass es keine Mindestlaufzeit gibt; 2 nennen eine (90 Tage Anfangslaufzeit oder ein Probemonat). 8 von 29 schließen Provision nach dem Ausstieg ausdrücklich aus. 0 legen eine Nachprovision offen, 21 äußern sich nicht dazu.
- [Aufnahmekriterien 2026](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/recherche/onlyfans-agentur-aufnahmekriterien-2026/): 0 von 29 Agenturen nennen eine Mindestzahl an Followern. 3 von 29 nennen ein Mindesteinkommen: 3.000 $ (2 Agenturen) und 10.000 $ im Monat. 2 verlangen bestehende Einnahmen ohne Zahl. 6 von 29 sagen ausdrücklich, dass keine Mindest-Follower oder Reichweite nötig sind, 7 weitere nehmen laut eigener Aussage Neueinsteiger.
- [Vertrags-Check: Ist dein OnlyFans-Agenturvertrag fair?](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/tools/vertrags-check/): 14 Fragen, Ampel-Ergebnis, nichts wird hochgeladen, keine Rechtsberatung. Ein fairer OnlyFans-Agenturvertrag berechnet die Provision vom Netto mit schriftlichem Satz je Leistung, lässt dich mit 30 Tagen Frist ohne Gebühr gehen, beendet die Provision mit dem Vertrag und lässt Login, Auszahlung, Content und Social Media auf deinem Namen. Nur 8 von 29 geprüften Agenturen schließen eine Nachprovision aus.
- [White Door Management Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/white-door-management/): 9,3/10, Platz 1
- [Fan Fusion Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/fan-fusion/): 8,6/10, Platz 2
- [Lumina Connect Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/lumina-connect/): 7,7/10, Platz 3
- [Noblesse Studios Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/noblesse-studios/): 6,6/10, Platz 4
- [TalentGrow Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/talentgrow/): 6,1/10, Platz 5
- [BeaconOFM Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/beacon-ofm/): 6,1/10, Platz 6
- [FEM Management Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/fem-management/): 5,9/10, Platz 7
- [Perlage Studios Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/perlage-studios/): 5,7/10, Platz 9
- [Foxy Studios Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/foxy-studios/): 5,7/10, Platz 10
- [Aruna Talent Erfahrungen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/aruna-talent/): 5,5/10, Platz 11
- [Die richtige OnlyFans Agentur finden](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/ratgeber/onlyfans-agentur-finden/)
- [Warnsignale bei OnlyFans Agenturen](https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/ratgeber/onlyfans-agentur-warnsignale/)
- Ist White Door Management seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/white-door-management/
- Ist Fan Fusion seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/fan-fusion/
- Ist Lumina Connect seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/lumina-connect/
- Ist Noblesse Studios seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/noblesse-studios/
- Ist TalentGrow seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/talentgrow/
- Ist BeaconOFM seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/beacon-ofm/
- Ist FEM Management seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/fem-management/
- Ist Perlage Studios seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/perlage-studios/
- Ist Foxy Studios seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/foxy-studios/
- Ist Aruna Talent seriös? Erfahrungen, Provision, Vertrag → https://creatoragencyreview.com/de/agenturen/aruna-talent/